{"id":2451,"date":"2022-03-07T13:54:16","date_gmt":"2022-03-07T13:54:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eacademix.wpcolorlab.com\/?page_id=2451"},"modified":"2025-04-11T21:02:01","modified_gmt":"2025-04-11T21:02:01","slug":"future-member","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/academix.logos-a.com\/index.php\/future-member\/","title":{"rendered":"Peer Review and Editorial Integrity"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Peer Review Process<\/strong><\/p>

LOGOS – A applies a rigorous double-blind peer review<\/strong> process to ensure the academic integrity and quality of all published content. The review process is structured as follows:<\/p>

  1. Editorial Screening<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

    Upon submission to publishing@logos-a.com.mk<\/strong>, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the editorial board to assess:<\/p>

    • Relevance to the journal\u2019s scope<\/li>
    • Adherence to submission guidelines<\/li>
    • Originality and academic quality<\/li>
    • Compliance with ethical standards (plagiarism check)<\/li><\/ul>

      Manuscripts that do not meet the basic criteria are returned to the authors without peer review.<\/p>

      1. Reviewer Selection<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

        Suitable manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers<\/strong> with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their academic qualifications, publication record, and neutrality. Conflicts of interest are strictly avoided.<\/p>

        1. Double-Blind Review<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

          In accordance with the double-blind model:<\/p>

          • Authors do not know the identities of the reviewers<\/li>
          • Reviewers do not know the identities of the authors<\/li><\/ul>

            Each reviewer evaluates the manuscript based on:<\/p>

            • Originality and significance of the research<\/li>
            • Methodological soundness<\/li>
            • Theoretical and\/or empirical contribution<\/li>
            • Clarity of presentation and structure<\/li>
            • Adequacy of references and scholarly grounding<\/li><\/ul>
              1. Reviewer Recommendations<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

                Reviewers provide a written report and recommend one of the following decisions:<\/p>

                • Accept without revision<\/strong><\/li>
                • Accept with minor revisions<\/strong><\/li>
                • Revise and resubmit (major revisions)<\/strong><\/li>
                • Reject<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>

                  Constructive comments are provided to guide authors in improving their manuscript.<\/p>

                  1. Editorial Decision<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

                    The editorial board, guided by the reviewers\u2019 recommendations, makes the final decision. In cases of conflicting reviews, an additional reviewer may be invited to ensure a fair outcome.<\/p>

                    1. Revision and Resubmission<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

                      If revisions are requested, authors must resubmit their revised manuscript within a specified timeframe, along with a detailed response letter<\/strong> outlining how each reviewer comment has been addressed.<\/p>

                      1. Final Decision and Acceptance<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

                        Upon satisfactory revision, the editorial team conducts a final review. If the manuscript meets all academic and ethical standards, it is formally accepted for publication.<\/p>

                        1. Post-Acceptance Procedures<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>

                          The final manuscript is prepared for publication, including copyediting, layout formatting, and assignment of DOI. Authors will be asked to approve the final version before publication.<\/p>

                          \u00a0<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

                          \n\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\n
                          \n\n \n
                          \n Contact Form Demo<\/legend>